ymarkov: (Default)
Yisroel Markov ([personal profile] ymarkov) wrote 2019-03-20 01:24 pm (UTC)

еще до того как стало понятно что асбест канцерогенен

Нет. Установленный (и упомянутый в решении) первый критерий ответственности — "знал или имел основания знать об опасности".

Как ни крути - NAVY виноваты

Несомненно. Но — иммунитет:

Feres v. United States, 340 U.S. 135 (1950), combined three pending federal cases for a hearing in certiorari in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the United States is not liable under the Federal Tort Claims Act for injuries to members of the armed forces sustained while on active duty and not on furlough and resulting from the negligence of others in the armed forces.[1] The opinion is an extension of the English common-law concept of sovereign immunity.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting