Парадокс, мля!

Despite the fact there are more than 200 million guns in circulation, there is a certain tranquility and civility about American life.

[...]

A British man I met in Colorado recently told me he used to live in Kent but he moved to the American state of New Jersey and will not go home because it is, as he put it, "a gentler environment for bringing the kids up." This is New Jersey. Home of the Sopranos.

Brits arriving in New York, hoping to avoid being slaughtered on day one of their shopping mission to Manhattan are, by day two, beginning to wonder what all the fuss was about. By day three they have had had the scales lifted from their eyes. I have met incredulous British tourists who have been shocked to the core by the peacefulness of the place, the lack of the violent undercurrent so ubiquitous in British cities, even British market towns. "It seems so nice here," they quaver.

Well, it is! Ten or 20 years ago, it was a different story, but things have changed. And this is Manhattan. Wait till you get to London Texas, or Glasgow Montana, or Oxford Mississippi or Virgin Utah, for that matter, where every household is required by local ordinance to possess a gun.

Folks will have guns in all of these places and if you break into their homes they will probably kill you. They will occasionally kill each other in anger or by mistake, but you never feel as unsafe as you can feel in south London.

It is a paradox. Along with the guns there is a tranquillity and civility about American life of which most British people can only dream.

Хы, эт да! :-)

	БГ нам уже все сказал Твое имя ymarkov Глядя на тебе, БГ обычно произносит: Даже ночь бывает светлой к утру Чуть погодя, он добавляет: не прячь от Бога глаза, а то как он найдет нас? Будучи нетрезв, БГ называет тебя: Бессмертная сестра Хо Под вечер БГ любит спросить тебя: Что может быть глупее, чем ждать? И посвящает тебе: "Пси" Узнать о себе «БГ нам уже все сказал» © red_actor Twidog.ru — веселые тесты.

On the Usefulness of Boundaries (Book Review)

Hook-Up or Shut Up

By HARVEY C. MANSFIELD
April 29, 2008; Page A11

Sex and the Soul
By Donna Freitas
(Oxford, 328 pages, $24.95)

However high-minded their courses may sound – "Mirror of Princes," say, or "The Political Philosophy of Aristotle" – college students today enter a low hook-up culture when they leave the classroom. In case you don't know, a hook-up is a brief sexual encounter between two partners who don't necessarily know each other before and who don't necessarily want to know each other after. And it's free. The sort of transient sex that once was available to men only for money can now be had, without paying, from college women – as long as the man is a fellow student and minimally artful about his approach. If he is thwarted in one overture, he may try another with a reasonable prospect of success.

No doubt lurid anecdote and popular myth cause us to exaggerate the actual frequency of campus hook-ups: Most college students do not share in these delights. But most students also believe that "everyone does it," even if the individual student, for some reason, cannot locate a partner. Thus an active minority sets the tone and makes hooking up a "culture." When there are no sexual boundaries, either official or informal, the standard becomes the extreme, and all students feel the pressure to appear more promiscuous than they are. The traditional double standard of sexual conduct – more restrictive for women than for men – has been replaced by the single standard of the predatory male.

In "Sex and the Soul," Donna Freitas, an assistant professor of religion at Boston University, acutely describes this "liberated" campus culture and wisely analyzes its effects. She is especially concerned to measure conduct and expectation against the inner life of students, including their religious feeling or "spiritual" selves. Over and over again she finds a conflict that does not resolve itself happily.

http://online.wsj.com/article_print/SB120943338777251553.html